昨日再有懷疑來自今年9月底香港大學校務委員會閉門會議的錄音聲帶在台灣的網上討論區流出，今次涉及的包括相信是港大校委盧寵茂、廖長江和黃景強的發言以及港大校長馬斐森的回應。

錄音中的盧寵茂直言，之前以為陳文敏很好，但當看完其履歷，加上今年7月28日校委會被衝擊事件發生後，他對於是否應該由前法律學院院長陳文敏擔任學術及人力資源副校長持「保留意見」。理由包括：

‧校委遭衝擊禁錮，事後竟怪罪校委會
‧並無表示同情校委之意，包括受傷的盧寵茂
‧公開自稱候選人，違反保密原則
‧把政治論調帶進大學

以下為盧寵茂相關英文發言錄音譯文及英文發言原文：

「那是資格方面…看他的履歷，我感覺…第二部分是關於他是否適合這個職務。由於這個職務掌管學術領域的人事，我對於接任者的期許是：他必須非常公正無私。我沒有政治認同的問題，好嗎？你可以參加政治…集會或任何場合。我有許多工作同仁參加了佔領中環行動，他們非常黃（黃絲帶），我也曾表達我不支持佔領中環的立場與意見。我在醫院裡沒遇到任何問題，因為，他們在醫院是工作，政治意見不影響臨床服務，他們的職責也絕不因為支持佔領中環而改變。那不應該影響你在大學和醫院的工作。」

「但在那次事件之中，那一夜我們身處於校委會議風暴，緊接著我受傷了，事件過後，我沒有看到他對校委會成員表達任何表示同情之意，尤其…我…我本人…。我是由全體教職員選出來參與校委會的一員，我承擔了，我也受傷了。從他所表達的所有意見來看，事實上他是在怪罪校委會，他從不曾…我不是說我需要他的表示同情，但我也是教職員的一分子，我真的覺得，如果他是人力資源副校長，有教職員在這樣的事件中受傷，難道他應該一直說這是校委會的錯嗎？意思是我也有錯？在某種程度上，他這是在告訴社會大眾，而且是直接了當地告訴大眾，包括他的《香港家書》也是，他宣稱這依舊是校委會的錯…在某種程度…我所遭遇的痛苦…。這是我憂心之處，而且，如同我之前所說，我來參加這個委員會會議的時候，我知道他是可能的候選人。我一開始非常支持。但因為那場事件，再加上現在看到他的履歷和這些事情，還有他處理事件的方式… 我有疑慮，而且我真的必須三思他是否適合這個職務。我知道，物色委員會已經推薦他好一陣子，事實上7月就已有書面文件…。考量這種事件與這位候選人公開表達意見的方式，物色委員會是否仍認為這樣的人適合掌理學術人力資源？因為，身為教職員，我對此非常憂心，雖然我知道我在這裡並不代表教職員。」

(校委會主席梁智鴻：「委員會的推薦是在7月，抱歉，在5月，所以任何之後的事件都不在考慮之列。」)

「如果是這樣，我能否請問物色委員會主席，你會把之後發生的事列入考慮？基於這名候選人做了這樣的事。」

(港大校長馬斐森：做了什麼事？）

「他公開自稱候選人，違反保密原則，然後抱怨校委會沒有做正確的事。還有，儘管校委會成員包括教職員在事件中受傷，他也對校委會及教職員的安全不表示關心。」

「相反地，他怪罪校委會成員包括我這名職員。我對於有人以這種…感到驚恐，我不想亂猜但我覺得真正的威脅是有人… 我要說的是他把他的政治論調帶進大學，因為…政治意見，他可能認為我在這裡代表梁振英，我可以告訴你我不是梁粉。我是因為其他職員的支持而在這裡。我從未和梁振英談過。梁振英從未與我談過這件事。但看起來每個人，包括陳文敏都已（對我）貼標籤。無論我遭遇到什麼都是我活該。」

(英文發言原文)
"Well that’s the qualification part… my feeling about reading his CV...the second part is related to whether he's suitable for this position, because he's going to take care of academic staffing. And my expectation for such person has to be very impartial. I wouldn't have problem with political approval, alright? You can apply to your…political meeting or whatever. I do have many staffs who take part in occupy central. They are so yellow, and I've expressed my position and my opinion that I did not support occupy central. I don't have a problem in the hospital. Because they work in hospital, political opinion does not affect their clinical service, and never change their duty just because they support occupy central. That should not affect your work in the university and the hospital."

"But on that event, on that night that we have been in the storm of council meeting and subsequently my injury. And after the event, I really didn't see him showing any sympathy for the council members, and particular… I...myself…. I am a staff elected by the all the other staff to take part, and I sustained and injured. From all the opinion that he has expressed, actually he's still putting the blame on the council, he has never, I'm not saying I need his sympathy. But as a staff, I really feel if you are PVC (staffing) and if a staff member had an injury during an event like this, should you just keep on saying it's the council's fault. That means it's my fault as well? So in a way he's telling the public, he's speaking out in public, including his《香港家書》, that the fault remains in the council...in a way…for the suffering I encountered. That is my concern, and as I said before, I came to this meeting when I know he’s a potential candidate. I am very supportive initially, but with this and now looking his CV and what happened and his way of handling it... I really need to think twice before considering him as a suitable person for this position, and I wonder, I know the recommendation by the search committee was actually made a while ago, was actually written in July... With that kind of incidents and the way that this candidate has expressed his opinion in public, would the search committee still consider that kind of person is suitable to handle academic staffing and resource? Because as a staff, I am seriously concerned, even though I know I am here not representing the staff."

(The Council Chairman Leong Che Hung：The recommendation of search committee was made in July...sorry in May. So anything after that was not included.)

"…If that is the case. Can I ask the chairman of the search committee, would you take into account of what happened afterwards, that this candidate has done this？"

(President and Vice-Chancellor Peter Mathieson: done what?)

"Openly breached the confidentiality calling himself a candidate, and then was complaining that the council has not doing the right thing? and despite the fact that there are council members including the staff member who suffer injury during that event, he has expressed no concern whatsoever, to the safety of the council and staff members."

"And in contrast, he put the blame on the council members and including me as a staff member. I am really terrified that someone with this kind of... I don't want to extrapolate but I felt the threat is someone ... i would say he's putting his political intonation into the university. Because at a ... political opinion he may think that I am here to represent CY. I can tell you I am not a 梁粉. I came in with support of the staff members. I've never talked to CY. CY has never talked to me about this. But it seems that everybody there including Johannes Chan has labelled..Whatever I suffer, I deserve it."